From 5b80bfd7bffd4c20d80b7c70a7130529e9a755dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ToshikazuOhiwa Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:24:26 +0900 Subject: agl-basesystem --- ...est-Recursively-remove-pre-existing-entri.patch | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 external/meta-virtualization/recipes-containers/oci-image-tools/files/0001-image-manifest-Recursively-remove-pre-existing-entri.patch (limited to 'external/meta-virtualization/recipes-containers/oci-image-tools/files/0001-image-manifest-Recursively-remove-pre-existing-entri.patch') diff --git a/external/meta-virtualization/recipes-containers/oci-image-tools/files/0001-image-manifest-Recursively-remove-pre-existing-entri.patch b/external/meta-virtualization/recipes-containers/oci-image-tools/files/0001-image-manifest-Recursively-remove-pre-existing-entri.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5594f976 --- /dev/null +++ b/external/meta-virtualization/recipes-containers/oci-image-tools/files/0001-image-manifest-Recursively-remove-pre-existing-entri.patch @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +From 1f205c0aec5ea9e983d61a64e7ce871ae416bebd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: "W. Trevor King" +Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:16:46 -0700 +Subject: [PATCH 1/2] image/manifest: Recursively remove pre-existing entries + when unpacking + +Implementing the logic that is in-flight with [1], but using recursive +removal [2]. GNU tar has a --recursive-unlink option that's not +enabled by default, with the motivation being something like "folks +would be mad if we blew away a full tree and replaced it with a broken +symlink" [3]. That makes sense for working filesystems, but we're +building the rootfs from scratch here so losing information is not a +concern. This commit always uses recursive removal to get that old +thing off the filesystem (whatever it takes ;). + +The exception to the removal is if both the tar entry and existing +path occupant are directories. In this case we want to use GNU tar's +default --overwrite-dir behavior, but unpackLayer's metadata handling +is currently very weak so I've left it at "don't delete the old +directory". + +The reworked directory case also fixes a minor bug from 44210d05 +(cmd/oci-image-tool: fix unpacking..., 2016-07-22, #177) where the: + + if fi, err := os.Lstat(path); !(err == nil && fi.IsDir()) { + +block would not error out if the Lstat failed for a reason besides the +acceptable IsNotExist. Instead, it would attempt to call MkdirAll, +which would probably fail for the same reason that Lstat failed +(e.g. ENOTDIR). But it's better to handle the Lstat errors directly. + +[1]: https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/pull/317 +[2]: https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/pull/317/files#r79214718 +[3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_node/Dealing-with-Old-Files.html + +Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King +--- + image/manifest.go | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- + 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/image/manifest.go b/image/manifest.go +index 8834c1e5f2f0..144bd4f62219 100644 +--- a/src/import/image/manifest.go ++++ b/src/import/image/manifest.go +@@ -253,11 +253,27 @@ loop: + continue loop + } + ++ if hdr.Typeflag != tar.TypeDir { ++ err = os.RemoveAll(path) ++ if err != nil && !os.IsNotExist(err) { ++ return err ++ } ++ } ++ + switch hdr.Typeflag { + case tar.TypeDir: +- if fi, err := os.Lstat(path); !(err == nil && fi.IsDir()) { +- if err2 := os.MkdirAll(path, info.Mode()); err2 != nil { +- return errors.Wrap(err2, "error creating directory") ++ fi, err := os.Lstat(path) ++ if err != nil && !os.IsNotExist(err) { ++ return err ++ } ++ if os.IsNotExist(err) || !fi.IsDir() { ++ err = os.RemoveAll(path) ++ if err != nil && !os.IsNotExist(err) { ++ return err ++ } ++ err = os.MkdirAll(path, info.Mode()) ++ if err != nil { ++ return err + } + } + +-- +2.4.0.53.g8440f74 + -- cgit 1.2.3-korg