diff options
author | Shankho Boron Ghosh <shankhoghosh123@gmail.com> | 2020-11-18 19:55:02 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jan-Simon Moeller <jsmoeller@linuxfoundation.org> | 2020-11-18 16:51:07 +0000 |
commit | 9cc56459419f1225f5e9851825ad305424b3d6fb (patch) | |
tree | 6b761ad38074084217472fd47f23fd8c61eb3de1 /docs/2_Architecture_Guides/2.2_Security_Blueprint/9_Secure_development/1.2.9.0_Abstract.md | |
parent | c04ab11b946684902e3e39aef475a2d16c09e1c4 (diff) |
Revision of Architecture Guides
v1:
Introduction : Skeleton file of Build Process [WIP].
Security Blueprint : Multiple markdowns appended into single markdown.
v2:
Security Blueprint :
4_Kernel.md - Fixed Internal Link.
Annexes.md - Uniform markdown Title.
Bug-AGL: [SPEC-3633]
Signed-off-by: Shankho Boron Ghosh <shankhoghosh123@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I1ab478348a05464612d67f0e8a4570bda309022d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.automotivelinux.org/gerrit/c/AGL/documentation/+/25586
Reviewed-by: Jan-Simon Moeller <jsmoeller@linuxfoundation.org>
Tested-by: Jan-Simon Moeller <jsmoeller@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/2_Architecture_Guides/2.2_Security_Blueprint/9_Secure_development/1.2.9.0_Abstract.md')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/2_Architecture_Guides/2.2_Security_Blueprint/9_Secure_development/1.2.9.0_Abstract.md | 72 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 72 deletions
diff --git a/docs/2_Architecture_Guides/2.2_Security_Blueprint/9_Secure_development/1.2.9.0_Abstract.md b/docs/2_Architecture_Guides/2.2_Security_Blueprint/9_Secure_development/1.2.9.0_Abstract.md deleted file mode 100644 index bfceefe..0000000 --- a/docs/2_Architecture_Guides/2.2_Security_Blueprint/9_Secure_development/1.2.9.0_Abstract.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,72 +0,0 @@ ---- -title: Introduction ---- - -# Part 9 - Secure development - -In order to save a lot of time in code auditing, developers must follow coding -guidelines. - -## Secure build - -### Kernel build - -Tools like: - -- [Code optimisation](https://github.com/jduck/lk-reducer). -- [Kernel Drivers test](https://github.com/ucsb-seclab/dr_checker) with - [docs](https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity17/sec17-machiry.pdf). - -<!-- section-todo --> - -Domain | Improvement ------------------------ | ------------ -SecureDev-SecureBuild-1 | Add content. - -<!-- end-section-todo --> - -## App/Widget signatures - -<!-- section-todo --> - -Domain | Improvement ----------------------- | ------------ -SecureDev-Signatures-1 | Add content. - -<!-- end-section-todo --> - -## Code audit - -These tools are used to check the correct implementation of functionalities and -compliance with related good practices. - -- [Continuous Code Quality](https://www.sonarqube.org/). - -<!-- section-todo --> - -Domain | Improvement ---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- -SecureDev-CodeAudit-1 | Add CVE analyser. -SecureDev-CodeAudit-2 | [OSSTMM](http://www.isecom.org/mirror/OSSTMM.3.pdf). - -<!-- end-section-todo --> - -### SATS - -- [RATS](https://github.com/andrew-d/rough-auditing-tool-for-security) (Maybe to - old). -- [Flaw Finder](https://www.dwheeler.com/flawfinder/). - -- [wiki - list](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis). - -- [Mathematical - approach](https://perso.univ-rennes1.fr/david.lubicz/planches/David_Pichardie.pdf). - -It is necessary to verify that the application code does not use functions that -are depreciated and recognized as unsecured or cause problems. - -### DATS - -- [wiki - list](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_program_analysis#Example_tools). |