aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/3_Developer_Guides/2_Application_Framework_Binder/Annexes/1_Migration_to_bindings_v3.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/3_Developer_Guides/2_Application_Framework_Binder/Annexes/1_Migration_to_bindings_v3.md')
-rw-r--r--docs/3_Developer_Guides/2_Application_Framework_Binder/Annexes/1_Migration_to_bindings_v3.md199
1 files changed, 199 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/3_Developer_Guides/2_Application_Framework_Binder/Annexes/1_Migration_to_bindings_v3.md b/docs/3_Developer_Guides/2_Application_Framework_Binder/Annexes/1_Migration_to_bindings_v3.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bba5354
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/3_Developer_Guides/2_Application_Framework_Binder/Annexes/1_Migration_to_bindings_v3.md
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+---
+title: Migration to bindings v3
+---
+
+The ***binding*** interface evolved from version 1 to version 2
+for the following reasons:
+
+- integration of the security requirements within the bindings
+- simplification of the API (after developer feedbacks)
+- removal of obscure features and cleanup
+
+The ***binder*** can run ***bindings*** v1, v2 and/or v3 in any combination.
+Thus moving from v1 or v2 to v3 is not enforced at this time. But ...
+
+In the face to face meeting in Karlsruhe it was decided to remove support
+of bindings v1 and to deprecate the use of bindings v2.
+
+So at the end, **IT IS HIGHLY NEEDED TO SWITCH TO VERSION 3**
+
+This guide covers the migration of bindings from version 2 to version 3.
+
+The migration from version 1 is not treated here because bindings version 1
+are very old and probably do not exist anymore. If needed you can refer
+to the old [guide to migrate bindings from v1 to v2](./6_LEGACY_Migration_from_v1_to_v2.md).
+
+
+Differences between version 2 and version 3
+-------------------------------------------
+
+** *In v3 all is api.* **
+
+The version 3 introduces the concept of "API" that gather what was called before
+the daemon and the service. This is the new concept that predates the 2 others.
+
+The concept of API is intended to allow the definition of multiple APIs
+by a same "binding" (a dynamically loaded library).
+
+Because there is potentially several "API", the functions that were without
+context in bindings version 2 need now to tell what API is consumer.
+
+To be compatible with version 2, bindings v3 still have a default hidden
+context: the default API named **afbBindingV3root**.
+
+To summarize, the functions of class **daemon** and **service** use the default
+hidden API.
+
+It is encouraged to avoid use of functions of class **daemon** and **service**.
+You should replace these implicit calls to explicit **api** calls that
+reference **afbBindingV3root**.
+
+Same thing for the logging macros: **AFB_ERROR**, **AFB_WARNING**,
+**AFB_NOTICE**, **AFB_INFO**, **AFB_DEBUG** that becomes respectively
+**AFB_API_ERROR**, **AFB_API_WARNING**, **AFB_API_NOTICE**, **AFB_API_INFO**,
+**AFB_API_DEBUG**.
+
+Example of 2 equivalent writes:
+
+```C
+ AFB_NOTICE("send stress event");
+ afb_daemon_broadcast_event(stressed_event, NULL);
+```
+
+or
+
+```C
+ AFB_API_NOTICE(afbBindingV3root, "send stress event");
+ afb_api_broadcast_event(afbBindingV3root, stressed_event, NULL);
+```
+
+**The reply mechanism predates success and fail. Subcall has more power.**
+
+Task list for the migration
+---------------------------
+
+This task list is:
+
+1. Use the automatic migration procedure described below
+2. Adapt the functions **preinit**, **init** and **onevent**
+3. Consider use of the new reply
+4. Consider use of the new (sub)call
+5. Consider use of event handlers
+
+The remaining chapters explain these task with more details.
+
+Automatic migration!
+--------------------
+
+A tiny **sed** script is intended to perform a first pass on the code that
+you want to upgrade. It can be done using **curl** and applied using **sed**
+as below.
+
+```bash
+BASE=https://git.automotivelinux.org/src/app-framework-binder/plain
+SED=migration-to-binding-v3.sed
+curl -o $SED $BASE/docs/$SED
+sed -i -f $SED file1 file2 file3...
+```
+
+You can also follow
+[this link](https://git.automotivelinux.org/src/app-framework-binder/plain/docs/migration-to-binding-v3.sed)
+and save the file.
+
+This automatic action does most of the boring job but not all the job.
+The remaining of this guide explains the missing part.
+
+Adapt the functions preinit, init and onevent
+----------------------------------------------
+
+The signature of the functions **preinit**, **init** and **onevent** changed
+to include the target api.
+
+The functions of the v2:
+
+```C
+int (*preinit)();
+int (*init)();
+void (*onevent)(const char *event, struct json_object *object);
+```
+
+Gain a new first argument of type **afb_api_t** as below:
+
+```C
+int (*preinit)(afb_api_t api);
+int (*init)(afb_api_t api);
+void (*onevent)(afb_api_t api, const char *event, struct json_object *object);
+```
+
+For the migration, it is enough to just add the new argument without
+using it.
+
+Consider use of the new reply
+-----------------------------
+
+The v3 allows error reply with JSON object. To achieve it, an unified
+reply function's family is introduced:
+
+```C
+void afb_req_reply(afb_req_t req, json_object *obj, const char *error, const char *info);
+void afb_req_reply_v(afb_req_t req, json_object *obj, const char *error, const char *info, va_list args);
+void afb_req_reply_f(afb_req_t req, json_object *obj, const char *error, const char *info, ...);
+```
+
+The functions **success** and **fail** are still supported.
+These functions are now implemented as the following macros:
+
+
+```C
+#define afb_req_success(r,o,i) afb_req_reply(r,o,NULL,i)
+#define afb_req_success_f(r,o,...) afb_req_reply_f(r,o,NULL,__VA_ARGS__)
+#define afb_req_success_v(r,o,f,v) afb_req_reply_v(r,o,NULL,f,v)
+#define afb_req_fail(r,e,i) afb_req_reply(r,NULL,e,i)
+#define afb_req_fail_f(r,e,...) afb_req_reply_f(r,NULL,e,__VA_ARGS__)
+#define afb_req_fail_v(r,e,f,v) afb_req_reply_v(r,NULL,e,f,v)
+```
+
+This is a decision of the developer to switch to the new family
+**afb_req_reply** or to keep the good old functions **afb_req_fail**
+adn **afb_req_success**.
+
+Consider use of the new (sub)call
+---------------------------------
+
+The new call and subcall (the functions **afb_api_call**, **afb_api_call_sync**,
+**afb_req_subcall** and **afb_req_subcall_sync**) functions are redesigned
+to better fit the new reply behaviour. In most case the developer will benefit
+of the new behavior that directly gives result and error without enforcing
+to parse the JSON object result.
+
+The subcall functions are also fully redesigned to allow precise handling
+of the context and event subscriptions. The new design allows you to specify:
+
+ - whether the subcall is made in the session of the caller or in the session
+ of the service
+ - whether the credentials to use are those of the caller or those of the
+ service
+ - whether the caller or the service or both or none will receive the
+ eventually events during the subcall.
+
+See [calls](../3_Binder_References.md#afb_api_call) and
+[subcalls](../3_Binder_References.md#subcall-functions).
+
+The table below list the changes to apply:
+
+| Name in Version 2 | New name of Version 3
+|:----------------------:|:----------------------------------------------------:
+| afb_req_subcall | afb_req_subcall_legacy
+| afb_req_subcall_sync | afb_req_subcall_sync_legacy
+| afb_service_call | afb_service_call_legacy
+| afb_service_call_sync | afb_service_call_sync_legacy
+| afb_req_subcall_req | afb_req_subcall_req (same but obsolete)
+
+
+Consider use of event handlers
+------------------------------
+
+Binding V3 brings new ways of handling event in services. You can register
+functions that will handle specific events and that accept closure arguments.
+
+See [**afb_api_event_handler_add** and **afb_api_event_handler_del**](../3_Binder_References.md#event-functions) \ No newline at end of file