1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
|
From 575af3de702dae80c40bf510aaf7755374accb88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:41:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 03/92] sched/fair: Consider spare capacity in
find_idlest_group()
In low-utilization scenarios comparing relative loads in
find_idlest_group() doesn't always lead to the most optimum choice.
Systems with groups containing different numbers of cpus and/or cpus of
different compute capacity are significantly better off when considering
spare capacity rather than relative load in those scenarios.
In addition to existing load based search an alternative spare capacity
based candidate sched_group is found and selected instead if sufficient
spare capacity exists. If not, existing behaviour is preserved.
Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: freedom.tan@mediatek.com
Cc: keita.kobayashi.ym@renesas.com
Cc: mgalbraith@suse.de
Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476452472-24740-3-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6a0b19c0f39a7a7b7fb77d3867a733136ff059a3)
Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xw@bp.renesas.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b05d691..1ad3706 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5202,6 +5202,14 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
return 1;
}
+static inline int task_util(struct task_struct *p);
+static int cpu_util_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p);
+
+static unsigned long capacity_spare_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return capacity_orig_of(cpu) - cpu_util_wake(cpu, p);
+}
+
/*
* find_idlest_group finds and returns the least busy CPU group within the
* domain.
@@ -5211,7 +5219,9 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
int this_cpu, int sd_flag)
{
struct sched_group *idlest = NULL, *group = sd->groups;
+ struct sched_group *most_spare_sg = NULL;
unsigned long min_load = ULONG_MAX, this_load = 0;
+ unsigned long most_spare = 0, this_spare = 0;
int load_idx = sd->forkexec_idx;
int imbalance = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct-100)/2;
@@ -5219,7 +5229,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
load_idx = sd->wake_idx;
do {
- unsigned long load, avg_load;
+ unsigned long load, avg_load, spare_cap, max_spare_cap;
int local_group;
int i;
@@ -5231,8 +5241,12 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
local_group = cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu,
sched_group_cpus(group));
- /* Tally up the load of all CPUs in the group */
+ /*
+ * Tally up the load of all CPUs in the group and find
+ * the group containing the CPU with most spare capacity.
+ */
avg_load = 0;
+ max_spare_cap = 0;
for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(group)) {
/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
@@ -5242,6 +5256,11 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
load = target_load(i, load_idx);
avg_load += load;
+
+ spare_cap = capacity_spare_wake(i, p);
+
+ if (spare_cap > max_spare_cap)
+ max_spare_cap = spare_cap;
}
/* Adjust by relative CPU capacity of the group */
@@ -5249,12 +5268,33 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
if (local_group) {
this_load = avg_load;
- } else if (avg_load < min_load) {
- min_load = avg_load;
- idlest = group;
+ this_spare = max_spare_cap;
+ } else {
+ if (avg_load < min_load) {
+ min_load = avg_load;
+ idlest = group;
+ }
+
+ if (most_spare < max_spare_cap) {
+ most_spare = max_spare_cap;
+ most_spare_sg = group;
+ }
}
} while (group = group->next, group != sd->groups);
+ /*
+ * The cross-over point between using spare capacity or least load
+ * is too conservative for high utilization tasks on partially
+ * utilized systems if we require spare_capacity > task_util(p),
+ * so we allow for some task stuffing by using
+ * spare_capacity > task_util(p)/2.
+ */
+ if (this_spare > task_util(p) / 2 &&
+ imbalance*this_spare > 100*most_spare)
+ return NULL;
+ else if (most_spare > task_util(p) / 2)
+ return most_spare_sg;
+
if (!idlest || 100*this_load < imbalance*min_load)
return NULL;
return idlest;
--
1.9.1
|
