summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/signaling
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRomain Forlot <romain.forlot@iot.bzh>2017-06-26 15:06:10 +0200
committerRomain Forlot <romain.forlot@iot.bzh>2017-06-29 16:55:12 +0200
commitf007f831ab9ee3ce7010719300ffd84e4a787301 (patch)
tree5055e30bdf06bdeeb9a355c1342a5dfd8f6a0163 /signaling
parenteca44ae331bfe8bc4021541d5bf00c0fd8525f08 (diff)
Fix: wrong array format
Change-Id: I1c2c1479980c391dd037ce93cf5a30c36a07085a Signed-off-by: Romain Forlot <romain.forlot@iot.bzh>
Diffstat (limited to 'signaling')
-rw-r--r--signaling/architecture.md27
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/signaling/architecture.md b/signaling/architecture.md
index 8c6064d..48d596f 100644
--- a/signaling/architecture.md
+++ b/signaling/architecture.md
@@ -226,20 +226,19 @@ as simple as a signal service. The same remarks apply for automation languages.
Further investigations leads to some specifications already presents like the
one from Jaguar Land Rover [[VISS]], for **Vehicule Information Service
Specification** and another from Volkwagen AG named [[ViWi]], stand for
-**Volkwagen Infotainment Web Interface**. Each ones has their pro and cons.
-Let's see a little comparison:
-
-TODO: List of features not pro cons
-| VISS | ViWi |
-|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
-| + Filtering on node (not possible on several nodes or branches) | | + Describe a protocol |
-| + Access restrictions to signals | + Ability to specify custom signals |
-| +/- Use high level development languages | + RESTful HTTP calls |
-| - One big Server that handle requests | + Stateless |
-| - Filtering | + Filtering, sorting |
-| - Static signals tree not extensible [[VSS]] | -/+ Use JSON objects to communicate |
-| - Use of AMB ? | - Identification of resources may be a bit heavy going using UUID |
-| - Use of Websocket | |
+**Volkwagen Infotainment Web Interface**. Each ones has their differences and
+provides different approach serving the same goal:
+
+| VISS | ViWi |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Filtering on node (not possible on several nodes or branches) | Describe a protocol |
+| Access restrictions to signals | Ability to specify custom signals |
+| Use high level development languages | RESTful HTTP calls |
+| One big Server that handle requests | Stateless |
+| Filtering | Filtering, sorting |
+| Static signals tree not extensible [[VSS]] | Use JSON objects to communicate |
+| Use of AMB ? | Identification of resources may be a bit heavy going using UUID |
+| Use of Websocket | |
About **[[VISS]]** specification, the major problem comes from the fact that
signals are specified under the [[VSS]], **Vehicle Signal Specification**. So,