summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta-eas/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-renesas/0018-cpufreq-schedutil-move-slow-path-from-workqueue-to-S.patch
blob: 244cf824ac8785c3792eed87de79fc38bb3f814e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
From 389b1838b500ecc431c2421ee399b8f737e88cf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:53:22 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 18/92] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to
 SCHED_FIFO task

If slow path frequency changes are conducted in a SCHED_OTHER context
then they may be delayed for some amount of time, including
indefinitely, when real time or deadline activity is taking place.

Move the slow path to a real time kernel thread. In the future the
thread should be made SCHED_DEADLINE. The RT priority is arbitrarily set
to 50 for now.

Hackbench results on ARM Exynos, dual core A15 platform for 10
iterations:

$ hackbench -s 100 -l 100 -g 10 -f 20

Before			After
---------------------------------
1.808			1.603
1.847			1.251
2.229			1.590
1.952			1.600
1.947			1.257
1.925			1.627
2.694			1.620
1.258			1.621
1.919			1.632
1.250			1.240

Average:

1.8829			1.5041

Based on initial work by Steve Muckle.

Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 02a7b1ee3baa15a98b541d8cfd156bbe1a091c20)
Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xw@bp.renesas.com>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 68f21bb..f165ba0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -12,11 +12,14 @@
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
 
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <trace/events/power.h>
 
 #include "sched.h"
 
+#define SUGOV_KTHREAD_PRIORITY	50
+
 struct sugov_tunables {
 	struct gov_attr_set attr_set;
 	unsigned int rate_limit_us;
@@ -35,8 +38,10 @@ struct sugov_policy {
 
 	/* The next fields are only needed if fast switch cannot be used. */
 	struct irq_work irq_work;
-	struct work_struct work;
+	struct kthread_work work;
 	struct mutex work_lock;
+	struct kthread_worker worker;
+	struct task_struct *thread;
 	bool work_in_progress;
 
 	bool need_freq_update;
@@ -291,7 +296,7 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 	raw_spin_unlock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
 }
 
-static void sugov_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void sugov_work(struct kthread_work *work)
 {
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = container_of(work, struct sugov_policy, work);
 
@@ -308,7 +313,21 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy;
 
 	sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);
-	schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &sg_policy->work);
+
+	/*
+	 * For Real Time and Deadline tasks, schedutil governor shoots the
+	 * frequency to maximum. And special care must be taken to ensure that
+	 * this kthread doesn't result in that.
+	 *
+	 * This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is
+	 * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() and before that schedutil
+	 * rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
+	 *
+	 * Though there is a very rare case where the RT thread yields right
+	 * after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are
+	 * neglected for now.
+	 */
+	kthread_queue_work(&sg_policy->worker, &sg_policy->work);
 }
 
 /************************** sysfs interface ************************/
@@ -372,7 +391,6 @@ static struct sugov_policy *sugov_policy_alloc(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	sg_policy->policy = policy;
 	init_irq_work(&sg_policy->irq_work, sugov_irq_work);
-	INIT_WORK(&sg_policy->work, sugov_work);
 	mutex_init(&sg_policy->work_lock);
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&sg_policy->update_lock);
 	return sg_policy;
@@ -384,6 +402,51 @@ static void sugov_policy_free(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
 	kfree(sg_policy);
 }
 
+static int sugov_kthread_create(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+	struct task_struct *thread;
+	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_USER_RT_PRIO / 2 };
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* kthread only required for slow path */
+	if (policy->fast_switch_enabled)
+		return 0;
+
+	kthread_init_work(&sg_policy->work, sugov_work);
+	kthread_init_worker(&sg_policy->worker);
+	thread = kthread_create(kthread_worker_fn, &sg_policy->worker,
+				"sugov:%d",
+				cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus));
+	if (IS_ERR(thread)) {
+		pr_err("failed to create sugov thread: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(thread));
+		return PTR_ERR(thread);
+	}
+
+	ret = sched_setscheduler_nocheck(thread, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
+	if (ret) {
+		kthread_stop(thread);
+		pr_warn("%s: failed to set SCHED_FIFO\n", __func__);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	sg_policy->thread = thread;
+	kthread_bind_mask(thread, policy->related_cpus);
+	wake_up_process(thread);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void sugov_kthread_stop(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+	/* kthread only required for slow path */
+	if (sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled)
+		return;
+
+	kthread_flush_worker(&sg_policy->worker);
+	kthread_stop(sg_policy->thread);
+}
+
 static struct sugov_tunables *sugov_tunables_alloc(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
 {
 	struct sugov_tunables *tunables;
@@ -424,12 +487,16 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		goto disable_fast_switch;
 	}
 
+	ret = sugov_kthread_create(sg_policy);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_sg_policy;
+
 	mutex_lock(&global_tunables_lock);
 
 	if (global_tunables) {
 		if (WARN_ON(have_governor_per_policy())) {
 			ret = -EINVAL;
-			goto free_sg_policy;
+			goto stop_kthread;
 		}
 		policy->governor_data = sg_policy;
 		sg_policy->tunables = global_tunables;
@@ -441,7 +508,7 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	tunables = sugov_tunables_alloc(sg_policy);
 	if (!tunables) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto free_sg_policy;
+		goto stop_kthread;
 	}
 
 	tunables->rate_limit_us = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
@@ -466,6 +533,9 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	policy->governor_data = NULL;
 	sugov_tunables_free(tunables);
 
+stop_kthread:
+	sugov_kthread_stop(sg_policy);
+
 free_sg_policy:
 	mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
 
@@ -493,6 +563,7 @@ static void sugov_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
 
+	sugov_kthread_stop(sg_policy);
 	sugov_policy_free(sg_policy);
 	cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
 }
@@ -541,7 +612,7 @@ static void sugov_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	synchronize_sched();
 
 	irq_work_sync(&sg_policy->irq_work);
-	cancel_work_sync(&sg_policy->work);
+	kthread_cancel_work_sync(&sg_policy->work);
 }
 
 static void sugov_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-- 
1.9.1