Integrate parts of meta-intel-iot-security

Adds the recipes of the sub layers
 - meta-security-framework
 - meta-security-smack

Change-Id: I618608008a3b3d1d34adb6e38048110f13ac0643
Signed-off-by: José Bollo <jose.bollo@iot.bzh>

1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meta-security/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/files/ext_attr.c-fix-adding-multiple-xattrs-during-image-c.patch b/meta-security/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/files/ext_attr.c-fix-adding-multiple-xattrs-during-image-c.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..67b8b68fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-security/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/files/ext_attr.c-fix-adding-multiple-xattrs-during-image-c.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+From 3b2b0922e031628f313f5480c4f1f9413c6656bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
+Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:51:43 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] ext_attr.c: fix adding multiple xattrs during image creation
+
+http://www.nongnu.org/ext2-doc/ext2.html#CONTRIB-EXTENDED-ATTRIBUTES
+contains the small snippet that "The entry descriptors are sorted by
+attribute name, so that two extended attribute blocks can be compared
+efficiently".
+
+The libext2fs code in e2fsprogs needs to be taught about this minor
+sorting detail. Otherwise creating an image with "mkfs.ext -d" from a
+filesystem that reports xattrs in listxattr() in an order that does
+not match the expected order will lead to an image where listxattr()
+reports all xattrs, but reading some values fails with ENODATA.
+
+[Patch from RP, commit message from Patrick and RP]
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending [https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8992]
+---
+ lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c | 7 ++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c b/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c
+index 0a4f8c0..be8f9c3 100644
+--- a/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c
++++ b/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c
+@@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static struct ea_name_index ea_names[] = {
+ static int attr_compare(const void *a, const void *b)
+ {
+ 	const struct ext2_xattr *xa = a, *xb = b;
++	size_t len;
+ 
+ 	if (xa->name == NULL)
+ 		return +1;
+@@ -267,7 +268,11 @@ static int attr_compare(const void *a, const void *b)
+ 		return -1;
+ 	else if (!strcmp(xb->name, "system.data"))
+ 		return +1;
+-	return 0;
++	len = strlen(xa->name) - strlen(xb->name);
++	if (len)
++		return len;
++
++	return strcmp(xa->name, xb->name);
+ }
+ 
+ static const char *find_ea_prefix(int index)
+-- 
+2.1.4
+