aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/roms/edk2/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/krb5/doc/kadm5/api-server-design.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'roms/edk2/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/krb5/doc/kadm5/api-server-design.tex')
-rw-r--r--roms/edk2/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/krb5/doc/kadm5/api-server-design.tex1053
1 files changed, 1053 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/roms/edk2/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/krb5/doc/kadm5/api-server-design.tex b/roms/edk2/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/krb5/doc/kadm5/api-server-design.tex
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..228e83113
--- /dev/null
+++ b/roms/edk2/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/krb5/doc/kadm5/api-server-design.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,1053 @@
+\documentstyle[12pt,fullpage,rcsid]{article}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+%% Make _ actually generate an _, and allow line-breaking after it.
+\let\underscore=\_
+\catcode`_=13
+\def_{\underscore\penalty75\relax}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\rcs$Id$
+
+\setlength{\parskip}{.7\baselineskip}
+\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
+
+\def\v#1{\verb+#1+}
+\def\k#1{K$_#1$}
+
+\title{KADM5 Library and Server \\ Implementation Design\thanks{\rcsId}}
+\author{Barry Jaspan}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\sloppy
+\maketitle
+
+{\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}\tableofcontents}
+
+\section{Overview}
+
+The KADM5 administration system is designed around the KADM5 API. The
+``server-side'' library libkadm5srv.a implements the KADM5 API by
+operating directly on the underlying KDC and admin databases. The
+``client-side'' library libkadm5clnt.a implements the KADM5 API via an
+RPC mechanism. The administration server kadmind accepts RPC requests
+from the client-side library and translates them into calls to the
+server-side library, performing authentication, authorization, and
+logging along the way.
+
+The two libraries, libkadm5clnt.a and libkadm5srv.a, export the
+identical kadm5 interface; for example, both contain definitions for
+kadm5_get_principal, and all other kadm5 functions. In most cases,
+the client library function just marshalls arguments and results into
+and out of an RPC call, whereas the server library function performs
+the actual operation on the database file. kadm5_init_*, however, are
+substantially different even though they export the same interface: on
+the client, they establish the RPC connection and GSS-API context,
+whereas on the server side the open the database files, read in the
+password dictionary, and the like. Also, the kadm5_free functions
+operate on local process memory in both libraries.
+
+The admin server is implemented as a nearly-stateless transaction
+server, where each admin API function represents a single transaction.
+No per-client or per-connection information is stored; only local
+database handles are maintained between requests. The RPC mechanism
+provides access to remote callers' authentication credentials for
+authorization purposes.
+
+The admin API is exported via an RPC interface that hides all details
+about network encoding, authentication, and encryption of data on the
+wire. The RPC mechanism does, however, allow the server to access the
+underlying authentication credentials for authorization purposes.
+
+The admin system maintains two databases:
+%
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The master Kerberos (KDC) database is used to store all the
+information that the Kerberos server understands, thus allowing the
+greatest functionality with no modifications to a standard KDC.
+
+\item The KDC database also stores kadm5-specific per-principal
+information in each principal's krb5_tl_data list. In a prior
+version, this data was stored in a separate admin principal database;
+thus, when this document refers to ``the admin principal database,''
+it now refers to the appropriate krb5_tl_data entries in the KDC
+database.
+
+\item The policy database stores kadm5 policy information.
+\end{itemize}
+
+The per-principal information stored in the admin principal database
+consists of the principal's policy name and an array of the
+principal's previous keys. The old keys are stored encrypted in the
+key of the special principal ``kadmin/history'' that is created by the
+server library when it is first needed. Since a change in
+kadmin/history's key renders every principal's key history array
+useless, it can only be changed using the ovsec_adm_edit utility; that
+program will reencrypt every principal's key history in the new
+key.\footnote{ovsec_adm_edit has not yet been implemented, and there
+are currently no plans to implement it; thus, the history cannot
+currently be changed.} The server library refuses all requests to
+change kadmin/history's key.
+
+\section{API Handles}
+
+Each call to kadm5_init_* on the client or server creates a new API
+handle. The handles encapsulate the API and structure versions
+specified by kadm5_init_*'s caller and all other internal data needed
+by the library. A process can have multiple open API handles
+simultaneously by calling kadm5_init_* multiple times, and call can
+specify a different version, client or service principal, and so
+forth.
+
+Each kadm5 function verifies the handle it is given with the
+CHECK_HANDLE or _KADM5_CHECK_HANDLE macros. The CHECK_HANDLE macro
+differs for the client and server library because the handle types
+used by those libraries differ, so it is defined in both
+$<$client_internal.h$>$ and $<$server_internal.h$>$ in the library
+source directory. In each header file, CHECK_HANDLE first calls
+GENERIC_CHECK_HANDLE, defined in $<$admin_internal.h$>$, which
+verifies the magic number, API version, and structure version that is
+contained in both client and server handles. CHECK_HANDLE then calls
+either CLIENT_CHECK_HANDLE or SERVER_CHECK_HANDLE respectively to
+verify the client- or server-library specific handle fields.
+
+The CHECK_HANDLE macro is useful because it inlines the handle check
+instead of requiring a separate function call. However, using
+CHECK_HANDLE means that a source file cannot be compiled once and
+included into both the client and server library, because CHECK_HANDLE
+is always either specific to either the client or server library, not
+both. There are a number of functions that can be implemented with
+the same code in both the client and server libraries, however,
+including all of the kadm5_free functions and
+kadm5_chpass_principal_util. The _KADM5_CHECK_HANDLE macro solves
+this problem; instead of inlining the handle check, it calls the
+function _kadm5_check_handle which is defined separately in both the
+client and server library, in client_init.c and server_init.c.
+Since these two files are only compiled once and put in a single
+library, they simply verify the handle they are passed with
+CHECK_HANDLE and return the result.
+
+\section{API Versioning}
+
+The KADM5 system was designed by OpenVision to support multiple
+versions of the KADM5 API. MIT has not adopted this level of support,
+and considers the KADM5 C API to be unstable from release to release.
+This section describes the original design intent; bear in mind that
+only the most recent API is supported by current MIT krb5 releases,
+and that the API version does not necessarily change with API changes
+unless there is a need to do so for wire compatibility.
+
+Historically, three versions of the KADM5 API have existed:
+KADM5_API_VERSION_1 through KADM5_API_VERSION_3. The first version
+was equivalent to the initial OpenVision API,
+OVSEC_KADM_API_VERSION_1; the second was created during the initial
+integration of the OpenVision system into the MIT release; and the
+third was created for MIT krb5 1.8 to add lockout fields to policy
+entries. MIT dropped wire compatibility support for version 1 in MIT
+krb5 1.8 (as version 1 was never used in shipped MIT code), but
+retains wire compatibility support for version 2.
+
+Implementing a versioned API in C via with both local and RPC access
+presents a number of design issues, some of them quite subtle. The
+contexts in which versioning considerations must be made include:
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item Typedefs, function declarations, and defined constants depend on
+the API version a client is written to and must be correct at compile
+time.
+
+\item Each function in the server library must behave according to the
+API version specified by the caller at runtime to kadm5_init_*.
+
+\item The XDR functions used by the RPC layer to transmit function
+arguments and results must encode data structures correctly depending
+on the API version specified by the client at runtime.
+
+\item Each function in the client library must behave according to the
+API version specified by the caller at runtime to kadm5_init_*.
+
+\item The RPC server (kadmind) must accept calls from a client using
+any supported API version, and must then invoke the function in the
+server library corresponding to the RPC with the API version indicated
+by the client caller.
+
+\item When a first API function is invoked that needs to call a second
+function in the API on its own behalf, and that second API function's
+behavior depends on the API version specified, the first API function
+must either be prepared to call the second API function at whatever
+version its caller specifies or have a means of always calling the
+second API function at a pre-determined version.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+The following functions describe how each context is handled.
+
+\subsection{Designing for future compatibility}
+
+Any code whose behavior depends on the API version should be written
+so as to be compatible with future, currently unknown API versions on
+the grounds that any particuarly piece of API behavior will most
+likely not change between versions. For example, in the current
+system, the code is not written as ``if this is VERSION_1, do X, else
+if this is VERSION_2, do Y''; instead, it is written as ``if this is
+VERSION_1, do X; else, do Y.'' The former will require additional
+work when VERSION_3 is defined, even if ``do Y'' is still the correct
+action, whereas the latter will work without modification in that
+case.
+
+\subsection{Header file declarations}
+
+Typedefs, defined constants and macros, and function declarations may
+change between versions. A client is always written to a single,
+specific API version, and thus expects the header files to define
+everything according to that API. Failure of a header file to define
+values correctly will result in either compiler warnings (e.g. if the
+pointer type of a function argument changes) or fatal errors (e.g. if
+the number of arguments to a function changes, or the fields of a
+structure change). For example, in VERSION_1, kadm5_get_policy took a
+pointer to a pointer to a structure, and in VERSION_2 it takes a
+pointer to a structure; that would generate a warning if not correct.
+In VERSION_1, kadm5_randkey_principal accepted three arguments but in
+VERSION_2 accepts four; that would generate a fatal error.
+
+The header file defines everything correctly based on the value of the
+USE_KADM5_API_VERSION constant. The constant can be assigned to an
+integer corresponding to any supported API version, and defaults to
+the newest version. The header files then simply use an \#ifdef to
+include the right definitions:
+%
+\begin{verbatim}
+#if USE_KADM5_API_VERSION == 1
+kadm5_ret_t kadm5_get_principal(void *server_handle,
+ krb5_principal principal,
+ kadm5_principal_ent_t *ent);
+#else
+kadm5_ret_t kadm5_get_principal(void *server_handle,
+ krb5_principal principal,
+ kadm5_principal_ent_t ent,
+ long mask);
+#endif
+\end{verbatim}
+
+\subsection{Server library functions}
+
+Server library functions must know how many and what type of arguments
+to expect, and must operate on those arguments correctly, based on the
+API version with which they are invoked. The API version is contained
+in the handle that is alwasy passed as their first argument, generated
+by kadm5_init_* (to which the client specified the API version to use
+at run-time).
+
+In general, it is probably unsafe for a compiled function in a library
+to re-interpret the number and type of defined arguments at run-time
+since the calling conventions may not allow it; for example, a
+function whose first argument was a short in one version and a pointer
+in the next might fail if it simply typed-casted the argument. In
+that case, the function would have to written to take variable
+arguments (i.e. use $<$stdarg.h$>$) and extract them from the stack
+based on the API version. Alternatively, a separate function for each
+API version could be defined, and $<$kadm5/admin.h$>$ could be written
+to \v{\#define} the exported function name based on the value of
+USE_KADM5_API_VERSION.
+
+In the current system, it turns out, that isn't necessary, and future
+implementors should take try to ensure that no version has semantics
+that will cause such problems in the future. All the functions in
+KADM5 that have different arguments or results between VERSION_1 and
+VERSION_2 do so simply by type-casting their arguments to the
+appropriate version and then have separate code paths to handle each
+one correctly. kadm5_get_principal, in svr_principal.c, is a good
+example. In VERSION_1, it took the address of a pointer to a
+kadm5_principal_ent_t to fill in with a pointer to allocated memory;
+in VERSION_2, it takes a pointer to a structure to fill in, and a mask
+of which fields in that structure should be filled in. Also, the
+contents of the kadm5_principal_ent_t changed slightly between the two
+versions. kadm5_get_principal handles versioning as follows
+(following along in the source code will be helpful):
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item If VERSION_1, it saves away its entry argument (address of a
+pointer to a structure) and resets its value to contain the address of
+a locally stack-allocated entry structure; this allows most of the
+function to written once, in terms of VERSION_2 semantics. If
+VERSION_1, it also resets its mask argument to be
+KADM5_PRINCIPAL_NORMAL_MASK, because that is the equivalent to
+VERSION_1 behavior, which was to return all the fields of the
+structure.
+
+\item The bulk of the function is implemented as expected for
+VERSION_2.
+
+\item The new fields in the VERSION_2 entry structure are assigned
+inside a block that is only execute if the caller specified
+VERSION_2. This saves a little time for a VERSION_1 caller.
+
+\item After the entry structure is filled, the function checks again
+if it was called as VERSION_1. If so, it allocates a new
+kadm5_principal_ent_t_v1 structure (which is conveniently defined in
+the header file) with malloc, copies the appropriate values from the
+entry structure into the VERSION_1 entry structure, and then writes
+the address of the newly allocated memory into address specified by
+the original entry argument which it had previously saved away.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+There is another complication involved in a function re-interpreting
+the number of arguments it receives at compile time---it cannot assign
+any value to an argument for which the client did not pass a value.
+For example, a VERSION_1 client only passes three arguments to
+kadm5_get_principal. If the implementation of kadm5_get_principal
+notices that the caller is VERSION_1 and therefore assigns its fourth
+argument, mask, to a value that mimics the VERSION_1 behavior, it may
+inadvertently overwrite data on its caller's stack. This problem can
+be avoided simply by using a true local variable in such cases,
+instead of treating an unpassed argument as a local variable.
+
+\subsection{XDR functions}
+
+The XDR functions used to encode function arguments and results must
+know how to encode the data for any API version. This is important
+both so that all the data gets correctly transmitted and so that
+protocol compatibility between clients or servers using the new
+library but an old API version is maintained; specific, new kadmind
+servers should support old kadm5 clients.
+
+The signature of all XDR functions is strictly defined: they take the
+address of an XDR function and the address of the data object to be
+encoded or decoded. It is thus impossible to provide the API version
+of the data object as an additional argument to an XDR function.
+There are two other means to convey the information, storing the API
+version to use as a field in the data object itself and creating
+separate XDR functions to handle each different version of the data
+object, and both of them are used in KADM5.
+
+In the client library, each kadm5 function collects its arguments into
+a single structure to be passed by the RPC; similarly, it expects all
+of the results to come back as a single structure from the RPC that it
+will then decode back into its constituent pieces (these are the
+standard ONC RPC semantics). In order to pass versioning information
+to the XDR functions, each function argument and result datatype has a
+filed to store the API version. For example, consider
+kadm5_get_principal's structures:
+%
+\begin{verbatim}
+struct gprinc_arg {
+ krb5_ui_4 api_version;
+ krb5_principal princ;
+ long mask;
+};
+typedef struct gprinc_arg gprinc_arg;
+bool_t xdr_gprinc_arg();
+
+struct gprinc_ret {
+ krb5_ui_4 api_version;
+ kadm5_ret_t code;
+ kadm5_principal_ent_rec rec;
+};
+typedef struct gprinc_ret gprinc_ret;
+bool_t xdr_gprinc_ret();
+\end{verbatim}
+%
+kadm5_get_principal (in client_principal.c) assigns the api_version
+field of the gprinc_arg to the version specified by its caller,
+assigns the princ field based on its arguments, and assigns the mask
+field from its argument if the caller specified VERSION_2. It then
+calls the RPC function clnt_call, specifying the XDR functions
+xdr_gprinc_arg and xdr_gprinc_ret to handle the arguments and results.
+
+xdr_gprinc_arg is invoked with a pointer to the gprinc_arg structure
+just described. It first encodes the api_version field; this allows
+the server to know what to expect. It then encodes the krb5_principal
+structure and, if api_version is VERSION_2, the mask. If api_version
+is not VERSION_2, it does not encode {\it anything} in place of the
+mask, because an old VERSION_1 server will not expect any other data
+to arrive on the wire there.
+
+The server performs the kadm5_get_principal call and returns its
+results in an XDR encoded gprinc_ret structure. clnt_call, which has
+been blocking until the results arrived, invokes xdr_gprinc_ret with a
+pointer to the encoded data for it to decode. xdr_gprinc_ret first
+decodes the api_version field, and then the code field since that is
+present in all versions to date. The kadm5_principal_ent_rec presents
+a problem, however. The structure does not itself contain an
+api_version field, but the structure is different between the two
+versions. Thus, a single XDR function cannot decode both versions of
+the structure because it will have no way to decide which version to
+expect. The solution is to have two functions,
+kadm5_principal_ent_rec_v1 and kadm5_principal_ent_rec, which always
+decode according to VERSION_1 or VERSION_2, respectively. gprinc_ret
+knows which one to invoke because it has the api_version field
+returned by the server (which is always the same as that specified by
+the client in the gpring_arg).
+
+In hindsight, it probably would have been better to encode the API
+version of all structures directly in a version field in the structure
+itself; then multiple XDR functions for a single data type wouldn't be
+necessary, and the data objects would stand complete on their own.
+This can be added in a future API version if desired.
+
+\subsection{Client library functions}
+
+Just as with server library functions, client library functions must
+be able to interpret their arguments and provide result according to
+the API version specified by the caller. Again, kadm5_get_principal
+(in client_principal.c) is a good example. The gprinc_ret structure
+that it gets back from clnt_call contains a kadm5_principal_ent_rec or
+a kadm5_principal_ent_rec_v1 (the logic is simplified somewhat because
+the VERSION_2 structure only has new fields added on the end). If
+kadm5_get_principal was invoked with VERSION_2, that structure should
+be copied into the pointer provided as the entry argument; if it was
+invoked with VERSION_1, however, the structure should be copied into
+allocated memory whose address is then written into the pointer
+provided by the entry argument. Client library functions make this
+determination based on the API version specified in the provided
+handle, just like server library functions do.
+
+\subsection{Admin server stubs}
+
+When an RPC call arrives at the server, the RPC layer authenticates
+the call using the GSS-API, decodes the arguments into their
+single-structure form (ie: a gprinc_arg) and dispatches the call to a
+stub function in the server (in server_stubs.c). The stub function
+first checks the caller's authorization to invoke the function and, if
+authorized, calls the kadm5 function corresponding to the RPC function
+with the arguments specified in the single-structure argument.
+
+Once again, kadm5_get_principal is a good example for the issues
+involved. The contents of the gprinc_arg given to the stub
+(get_principal_1) depends on the API version the caller on the client
+side specified; that version is available to the server in the
+api_version field of the gprinc_arg. When the server calls
+kadm5_get_principal in the server library, it must give that function
+an API handle that contains the API version requested by the client;
+otherwise the function semantics might not be correct. One
+possibility would be for the server to call kadm5_init for each client
+request, specifing the client's API version number and thus generating
+an API handle with the correct version, but that would be
+prohibitively inefficient. Instead, the server dips down in the
+server library's internal abstraction barrier, using the function
+new_server_handle to cons up a server handle based on the server's own
+global_server_handle but using the API version specified by the
+client. The server then passes the newly generated handle to
+kadm5_get_principal, ensuring the right behavior, and creates the
+gprinc_ret structure in a manner similar to that described above.
+
+Although new_server_handle solves the problem of providing the server
+with an API handle containing the right API version number, it does
+not solve another problem: that a single source file, server_stubs.c,
+needs to be able to invoke functions with arguments appropriate for
+multiple API versions. If the client specifies VERSION_1, for
+example, the server must invoke kadm5_get_principal with three
+arguments, but if the client specifies VERSION_2 the server must
+invoke kadm5_get_principal with four arguments. The compiler will not
+allow this inconsistency. The server defines wrapper functions in a
+separate source file that match the old version, and the separate
+source file is compiled with USE_KADM5_API_VERSION set to the old
+version; see kadm5_get_principal_v1 in server_glue_v1.c. The server
+then calls the correct variant of kadm5_get_principal_* based on the
+API version and puts the return values into the gprinc_ret in a manner
+similar to that described above.
+
+Neither of these solutions are necessarily correct. new_server_handle
+violates the server library's abstraction barrier and is at best a
+kludge; the server library should probably export a function to
+provide this behavior without violating the abstraction;
+alternatively, the librar should be modified so that having the server
+call kadm5_init for each client RPC request would not be too
+inefficient. The glue functions in server_glue_v1.c really are not
+necessary, because the server stubs could always just pass dummy
+arguments for the extra arguments; after all, the glue functions pass
+{\it nothing} for the extra arguments, so they just end up as stack
+garbage anyway.
+
+Another alternative to the new_server_handle problem is to have the
+server always invoke server library functions at a single API version,
+and then have the stubs take care of converting the function arguments
+and results back into the form expected by the caller. In general,
+however, this might require the stubs to duplicate substantial logic
+already present in the server library and further violate the server
+library's abstraction barrier.
+
+\subsection{KADM5 self-reference}
+
+Some kadm5 functions call other kadm5 functions ``on their own
+behalf'' to perform functionality that is necessary but that does not
+directly affect what the client sees. For example,
+kadm5_chpass_principal has to enforce password policies; thus, it
+needs to call kadm5_get_principal and, if the principal has a policy,
+kadm5_get_policy and kadm5_modify_principal in the process of changing
+a principal's password. This leads to a complication: what API handle
+should kadm5_chpass_principal pass to the other kadm5 functions it
+calls?
+
+The ``obvious,'' but wrong, answer is that it should pass the handle
+it was given by its caller. The caller may provide an API handle
+specifying any valid API version. Although the semantics of
+kadm5_chpass_principal did not change between VERSION_1 and VERSION_2,
+the declarations of both kadm5_get_principal and kadm5_get_policy
+did. Thus, to use the caller's API handle, kadm5_chpass_principal
+will have to have a separate code path for each API version, even
+though it itself did not change bewteen versions, and duplicate a lot
+of logic found elsewhere in the library.
+
+Instead, each API handle contains a ``local-use handle,'' or lhandle,
+that kadm5 functions should use to call other kadm5 functions. For
+example, the client-side library's handle structure is:
+%
+\begin{verbatim}
+typedef struct _kadm5_server_handle_t {
+ krb5_ui_4 magic_number;
+ krb5_ui_4 struct_version;
+ krb5_ui_4 api_version;
+ char * cache_name;
+ int destroy_cache;
+ CLIENT * clnt;
+ krb5_context context;
+ kadm5_config_params params;
+ struct _kadm5_server_handle_t *lhandle;
+} kadm5_server_handle_rec, *kadm5_server_handle_t;
+\end{verbatim}
+%
+The lhandle field is allocated automatically when the handle is
+created. All of the fields of the API handle that are accessed
+outside kadm5_init are also duplicated in the lhandle; however, the
+api_version field of the lhandle is always set to a {\it constant}
+value, regardless of the API version specified by the caller to
+kadm5_init. In the current implementation, the lhandle's api_version
+is always VERSION_2.
+
+By passing the caller's handle's lhandle to recursively called kadm5
+functions, a kadm5 function is assured of invoking the second kadm5
+function with a known API version. Additionally, the lhandle's
+lhandle field points back to the lhandle, in case kadm5 functions call
+themselves more than one level deep; handle$->$lhandle always points
+to the same lhandle, no matter how many times the indirection is
+performed.
+
+This scheme might break down if a kadm5 function has to call another
+kadm5 function to perform operations that they client will see and for
+its own benefit, since the semantics of the recursively-called kadm5
+function may depend on the API version specified and the client may be
+depending on a particular version's behavior. Future implementators
+should avoid creating a situation in which this is possible.
+
+\section{Server Main}
+
+The admin server starts by trapping all fatal signals and directing
+them to a cleanup-and-exit function. It then creates and exports the
+RPC interface and enters its main loop.
+
+The main loop dispatches all incoming requests to the RPC mechanism.
+In a previous version, after 15 seconds of inactivity, the server
+closed all open databases; each database was be automatically reopened
+by the API function implementations as necessary. That behavior
+existed to protect against loss of written data before the process
+exited. The current database libraries write all changes out to disk
+immediately, however, so this behavior is no longer required or
+performed.
+
+\section{Remote Procedure Calls}
+
+The RPC for the Admin system will be based on ONC RPC. ONC RPC is
+used because it is a well-known, portable RPC mechanism. The
+underlying external data representation (xdr) mechanisms for wire
+encapsulation are well-known and extensible. Authentication to the
+admin server and encryption of all RPC functional arguments and
+results are be handled via the AUTH_GSSAPI authentication flavor of
+ONC RPC.
+
+\section{Database Record Types}
+\label{sec:db-types}
+
+\subsection{Admin Principal, osa_princ_ent_t}
+
+The admin principal database stores records of the type
+osa_princ_ent_t (declared in $<$kadm5/adb.h$>$), which is the
+subset of the kadm5_principal_ent_t structure that is not stored
+in the Kerberos database plus the necessary bookkeeping information.
+The records are keyed by the ASCII representation of the principal's
+name, including the trailing NULL.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+typedef struct _osa_pw_hist_t {
+ int n_key_data;
+ krb5_key_data *key_data;
+} osa_pw_hist_ent, *osa_pw_hist_t;
+
+typedef struct _osa_princ_ent_t {
+ char * policy;
+ u_int32 aux_attributes;
+
+ unsigned int old_key_len;
+ unsigned int old_key_next;
+ krb5_kvno admin_history_kvno;
+ osa_pw_hist_ent *old_keys;
+
+
+ u_int32 num_old_keys;
+ u_int32 next_old_key;
+ krb5_kvno admin_history_kvno;
+ osa_pw_hist_ent *old_keys;
+} osa_princ_ent_rec, *osa_princ_ent_t;
+\end{verbatim}
+
+The fields that are different from kadm5_principal_ent_t are:
+
+\begin{description}
+\item[num_old_keys] The number of previous keys in the old_keys array.
+This value must be 0 $\le$ num_old_keys $<$ pw_history_num.
+
+\item[old_key_next] The index into old_keys where the next key should
+be inserted. This value must be 0 $\le$ old_key_next $\le$
+num_old_keys.
+
+\item[admin_history_kvno] The key version number of the kadmin/history
+principal's key used to encrypt the values in old_keys. If the server
+library finds that kadmin/history's kvno is different from the value
+in this field, it returns KADM5_BAD_HIST_KEY.
+
+\item[old_keys] The array of the principal's previous passwords, each
+encrypted in the kadmin/history key. There are num_old_keys
+elements. Each ``password'' in the array is itself an array of
+n_key_data krb5_key_data structures, one for each keysalt type the
+password was encoded in.
+\end{description}
+
+\subsection{Policy, osa_policy_ent_t}
+
+The policy database stores records of the type osa_policy_ent_t
+(declared in $<$kadm5/adb.h$>$) , which is all of
+kadm5_policy_ent_t plus necessary bookkeeping information. The
+records are keyed by the policy name.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+typedef struct _osa_policy_ent_t {
+ char *policy;
+
+ u_int32 pw_min_life;
+ u_int32 pw_max_life;
+ u_int32 pw_min_length;
+ u_int32 pw_min_classes;
+ u_int32 pw_history_num;
+
+ u_int32 refcnt;
+} osa_policy_ent_rec, *osa_policy_ent_t;
+\end{verbatim}
+
+\subsection{Kerberos, krb5_db_entry}
+
+The Kerberos database stores records of type krb5_db_entry, which is
+defined in the $<$k5-int.h$>$ header file. The semantics of each
+field are defined in the libkdb functional specification.
+
+\section{Database Access Methods}
+
+\subsection{Principal and Policy Databases}
+
+This section describes the database abstraction used for the admin
+policy database; the admin principal database used to be treated in
+the same manner but is now handled more directly as krb5_tl_data;
+thus, nothing in this section applies to it any more. Since both
+databases export equivalent functionality, the API is only described
+once. The character T is used to represent both ``princ'' and
+``policy''. The location of the principal database is defined by the
+configuration parameters given to any of the kadm5_init functions in
+the server library.
+
+Note that this is {\it only} a database abstraction. All functional
+intelligence, such as maintaining policy reference counts or sanity
+checking, must be implemented above this layer.
+
+Prototypes for the osa functions are supplied in
+$<$kadm5/adb.h$>$. The routines are defined in libkadm5srv.a. They
+require linking with the Berkely DB library.
+
+\subsubsection{Error codes}
+
+The database routines use com_err for error codes. The error code
+table name is ``adb'' and the offsets are the same as the order
+presented here. The error table header file is
+$<$kadm5/adb_err.h$>$. Callers of the OSA routines should first call
+init_adb_err_tbl() to initialize the database table.
+
+\begin{description}
+\item[OSA_ADB_OK] Operation successful.
+\item[OSA_ADB_FAILURE] General failure.
+\item[OSA_ADB_DUP] Operation would create a duplicate database entry.
+\item[OSA_ADB_NOENT] Named entry not in database.
+\item[OSA_ADB_BAD_PRINC] The krb5_principal structure is invalid.
+\item[OSA_ADB_BAD_POLICY] The specified policy name is invalid.
+\item[OSA_ADB_XDR_FAILURE] The principal or policy structure cannot be
+encoded for storage.
+\item[OSA_ADB_BADLOCKMODE] Bad lock mode specified.
+\item[OSA_ADB_CANTLOCK_DB] Cannot lock database, presumably because it
+is already locked.
+\item[OSA_ADB_NOTLOCKED] Internal error, database not locked when
+unlock is called.
+\item[OSA_ADB_NOLOCKFILE] KADM5 administration database lock file missing.
+\end{description}
+
+Database functions can also return system errors. Unless otherwise
+specified, database functions return OSA_ADB_OK.
+
+\subsubsection{Locking}
+
+All of the osa_adb functions except open and close lock and unlock the
+database to prevent concurrency collisions. The overall locking
+algorithm is as follows:
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item osa_adb_open_T calls osa_adb_init_db to allocate the osa_adb_T_t
+structure and open the locking file for further use.
+
+\item Each osa_adb functions locks the locking file and opens the
+appropriate database with osa_adb_open_and_lock, performs its action,
+and then closes the database and unlocks the locking file with
+osa_adb_close_and_unlock.
+
+\item osa_adb_close_T calls osa_adb_fini_db to close the locking file
+and deallocate the db structure.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+Functions which modify the database acquire an exclusive lock, others
+acqure a shared lock. osa_adb_iter_T acquires an exclusive lock for
+safety but as stated below consequences of modifying the database in
+the iteration function are undefined.
+
+\subsubsection{Function descriptions}
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t osa_adb_create_T_db(kadm5_config_params *params)
+\end{verbatim}
+%
+Create the database and lockfile specified in params. The database
+must not already exist, or EEXIST is returned. The lock file is only
+created after the database file has been created successfully.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t osa_adb_rename_T_db(kadm5_config_params *fromparams,
+ kadm5_config_params *toparams)
+\end{verbatim}
+%
+Rename the database named by fromparams to that named by toparams.
+The fromparams database must already exist; the toparams database may
+exist or not. When the function returns, the database named by
+fromparams no longer exists, and toparams has been overwritten with
+fromparams. This function acquires a permanent lock on both databases
+for the duration of its operation, so a failure is likely to leave the
+databases unusable.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t osa_adb_destroy_policy_db(kadm5_config_params *params)
+\end{verbatim}
+%
+Destroy the database named by params. The database file and lock file
+are deleted.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t
+osa_adb_open_T(osa_adb_T_t *db, char *filename);
+\end{verbatim}
+%
+Open the database named filename. Returns OSA_ADB_NOLOCKFILE if the
+database does not exist or if the lock file is missing. The database
+is not actually opened in the operating-system file sense until a lock
+is acquire.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t
+osa_adb_close_T(osa_adb_T_t db);
+\end{verbatim}
+%
+Release all shared or exclusive locks (on BOTH databases, since they
+use the same lock file) and close the database.
+
+It is an error to exit while a permanent lock is held;
+OSA_ADB_NOLOCKFILE is returned in this case.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t osa_adb_get_lock(osa_adb_T_t db, int mode)
+\end{verbatim}
+
+Acquire a lock on the administration databases; note that both
+databases are locked simultaneously by a single call. The mode
+argument can be OSA_ADB_SHARED, OSA_ADB_EXCLUSIVE, or
+OSA_ADB_PERMANENT. The first two and the third are really disjoint
+locking semantics and should not be interleaved.
+
+Shared and exclusive locks have the usual semantics, and a program can
+upgrade a shared lock to an exclusive lock by calling the function
+again. A reference count of open locks is maintained by this function
+and osa_adb_release_lock so the functions can be called multiple
+times; the actual lock is not released until the final
+osa_adb_release_lock. Note, however, that once a lock is upgraded
+from shared to exclusive, or from exclusive to permanent, it is not
+downgraded again until released completely. In other words,
+get_lock(SHARED), get_lock(EXCLUSIVE), release_lock() leaves the
+process with an exclusive lock with a reference count of one. An
+attempt to get a shared or exclusive lock that conflicts with another
+process results in the OSA_ADB_CANLOCK_DB error code.
+
+This function and osa_adb_release_lock are called automatically as
+needed by all other osa_adb functions to acquire shared and exclusive
+locks and so are not normally needed. They can be used explicitly by
+a program that wants to perform multiple osa_adb functions within the
+context of a single lock.
+
+Acquiring an OSA_ADB_PERMANENT lock is different. A permanent lock
+consists of first acquiring an exclusive lock and then {\it deleting
+the lock file}. Any subsequent attempt to acquire a lock by a
+different process will fail with OSA_ADB_NOLOCKFILE instead of
+OSA_ADB_CANTLOCK_DB (attempts in the same process will ``succeed''
+because only the reference count gets incremented). The lock file is
+recreated by osa_adb_release_lock when the last pending lock is released.
+
+The purpose of a permanent lock is to absolutely ensure that the
+database remain locked during non-atomic operations. If the locking
+process dies while holding a permanent lock, all subsequent osa_adb
+operations will fail, even through a system reboot. This is useful,
+for example, for ovsec_adm_import which creates both new database
+files in a temporary location and renames them into place. If both
+renames do not fully complete the database will probably be
+inconsistent and everything should stop working until an administrator
+can clean it up.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t osa_adb_release_lock(osa_adb_T_t db)
+\end{verbatim}
+
+Releases a shared, exclusive, or permanent lock acquired with
+osa_adb_get_lock, or just decrements the reference count if multiple
+locks are held. When a permanent lock is released, the lock file is
+re-created.
+
+All of a process' shared or exclusive database locks are released when
+the process terminates. A permanent lock is {\it not} released when
+the process exits (although the exclusive lock it begins with
+obviously is).
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t
+osa_adb_create_T(osa_adb_T_t db, osa_T_ent_t entry);
+\end{verbatim}
+%
+Adds the entry to the database. All fields are defined. Returns
+OSA_ADB_DUP if it already exists.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t
+osa_adb_destroy_T(osa_adb_T_t db, osa_T_t name);
+\end{verbatim}
+
+Removes the named entry from the database. Returns OSA_ADB_NOENT if
+it does not exist.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t
+osa_adb_get_T(osa_adb_T_t db, osa_T_t name,
+ osa_princ_ent_t *entry);
+\end{verbatim}
+
+Looks up the named entry in the db, and returns it in *entry in
+allocated storage that must be freed with osa_adb_free_T. Returns
+OSA_ADB_NOENT if name does not exist, OSA_ADB_MEM if memory cannot be
+allocated.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+osa_adb_ret_t
+osadb_adb_put_T(osa_adb_T_t db, osa_T_ent_t entry);
+\end{verbatim}
+
+Modifies the existing entry named in entry. All fields must be filled
+in. Returns OSA_DB_NOENT if the named entry does not exist. Note
+that this cannot be used to rename an entry; rename is implemented by
+deleting the old name and creating the new one (NOT ATOMIC!).
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+void osa_adb_free_T(osa_T_ent_t);
+\end{verbatim}
+
+Frees the memory associated with an osa_T_ent_t allocated by
+osa_adb_get_T.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+typedef osa_adb_ret_t (*osa_adb_iter_T_func)(void *data,
+ osa_T_ent_t entry);
+
+osa_adb_ret_t osa_adb_iter_T(osa_adb_T_t db, osa_adb_iter_T_func func,
+ void *data);
+\end{verbatim}
+
+Iterates over every entry in the database. For each entry ent in the
+database db, the function (*func)(data, ent) is called. If func
+returns an error code, osa_adb_iter_T returns an error code. If all
+invokations of func return OSA_ADB_OK, osa_adb_iter_T returns
+OSA_ADB_OK. The function func is permitted to access the database,
+but the consequences of modifying the database during the iteration
+are undefined.
+
+\subsection{Kerberos Database}
+
+Kerberos uses the libkdb interface to store krb5_db_entry records. It
+can be accessed and modified in parallel with the Kerberos server,
+using functions that are defined inside the KDC and the libkdb.a. The
+libkdb interface is defined in the libkdb functional specifications.
+
+\subsubsection{Initialization and Key Access}
+
+Keys stored in the Kerberos database are encrypted in the Kerberos
+master key. The admin server will therefore have to acquire the key
+before it can perform any key-changing operations, and will have to
+decrypt and encrypt the keys retrieved from and placed into the
+database via krb5_db_get_principal and _put_principal. This section
+describes the internal admin server API that will be used to perform
+these functions.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+krb5_principal master_princ;
+krb5_encrypt_block master_encblock;
+krb5_keyblock master_keyblock;
+
+void kdc_init_master()
+\end{verbatim}
+
+kdc_init_master opens the database and acquires the master key. It
+also sets the global variables master_princ, master_encblock, and
+master_keyblock:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item master_princ is set to the name of the Kerberos master principal
+(\v{K/M@REALM}).
+
+\item master_encblock is something I have no idea about.
+
+\item master_keyblock is the Kerberos master key
+\end{itemize}
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+krb5_error_code kdb_get_entry_and_key(krb5_principal principal,
+ krb5_db_entry *entry,
+ krb5_keyblock *key)
+\end{verbatim}
+
+kdb_get_entry_and_key retrieves the named principal's entry from the
+database in entry, and decrypts its key into key. The caller must
+free entry with krb5_dbm_db_free_principal and free key-$>$contents with
+free.\footnote{The caller should also \v{memset(key-$>$contents, 0,
+key-$>$length)}. There should be a function krb5_free_keyblock_contents
+for this, but there is not.}
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+krb5_error_code kdb_put_entry_pw(krb5_db_entry *entry, char *pw)
+\end{verbatim}
+
+kdb_put_entry_pw stores entry in the database. All the entry values
+must already be set; this function does not change any of them except
+the key. pw, the NULL-terminated password string, is converted to a
+key using string-to-key with the salt type specified in
+entry-$>$salt_type.\footnote{The salt_type should be set based on the
+command line arguments to the kadmin server (see the ``Command Line''
+section of the functional specification).}
+
+\section{Admin Principal and Policy Database Implementation}
+
+The admin principal and policy databases will each be stored in a
+single hash table, implemented by the Berkeley 4.4BSD db library.
+Each record will consist of an entire osa_T_ent_t. The key into the
+hash table is the entry name (for principals, the ASCII representation
+of the name). The value is the T entry structure. Since the key and
+data must be self-contained, with no pointers, the Sun xdr mechanisms
+will be used to marshal and unmarshal data in the database.
+
+The server in the first release will be single-threaded in that a
+request will run to completion (or error) before the next will run,
+but multiple connections will be allowed simultaneously.
+
+\section{ACLs, acl_check}
+
+The ACL mechanism described in the ``Authorization ACLs'' section of
+the functional specifications will be implemented by the acl_check
+function.
+
+\begin{verbatim}
+enum access_t {
+ ACCESS_DENIED = 0,
+ ACCESS_OK = 1,
+};
+
+enum access_t acl_check(krb5_principal princ, char *priv);
+\end{verbatim}
+
+The priv argument must be one of ``get'', ``add'', ``delete'', or
+``modify''. acl_check returns 1 if the principal princ has the named
+privilege, 0 if it does not.
+
+\section{Function Details}
+
+This section discusses specific design issues for Admin API functions
+that are not addresed by the functional specifications.
+
+\subsection{kadm5_create_principal}
+
+If the named principal exists in either the Kerberos or admin
+principal database, but not both, return KADM5_BAD_DB.
+
+The principal's initial key is not stored in the key history array at
+creation time.
+
+\subsection{kadm5_delete_principal}
+
+If the named principal exists in either the Kerberos or admin
+principal database, but not both, return KADM5_BAD_DB.
+
+\subsection{kadm5_modify_principal}
+
+If the named principal exists in either the Kerberos or admin
+principal database, but not both, return KADM5_BAD_DB.
+
+If pw_history_num changes and the new value $n$ is smaller than the
+current value of num_old_keys, old_keys should end up with the $n$
+most recent keys; these are found by counting backwards $n$ elements
+in old_keys from old_key_next. old_key_nexts should then be reset to
+0, the oldest of the saved keys, and num_old_keys set to $n$, the
+new actual number of old keys in the array.
+
+\subsection{kadm5_chpass_principal, randkey_principal}
+
+The algorithm for determining whether a password is in the principal's
+key history is complicated by the use of the kadmin/history \k{h}
+encrypting key.
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item For kadm5_chpass_principal, convert the password to a key
+using string-to-key and the salt method specified by the command line
+arguments.
+
+\item If the POLICY bit is set and pw_history_num is not zero, check
+if the new key is in the history.
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item Retrieve the principal's current key and decrypt it with \k{M}.
+If it is the same as the new key, return KADM5_PASS_REUSE.
+\item Retrieve the kadmin/history key \k{h} and decrypt it with \k{M}.
+\item Encrypt the principal's new key in \k{h}.
+\item If the principal's new key encrypted in \k{h} is in old_keys,
+return KADM5_PASS_REUSE.
+\item Encrypt the principal's current key in \k{h} and store it in
+old_keys.
+\item Erase the memory containing \k{h}.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+\item Encrypt the principal's new key in \k{M} and store it in the
+database.
+\item Erase the memory containing \k{M}.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+To store the an encrypted key in old_keys, insert it as the
+old_key_next element of old_keys, and increment old_key_next by one
+modulo pw_history_num.
+
+\subsection{kadm5_get_principal}
+
+If the named principal exists in either the Kerberos or admin
+principal database, but not both, return KADM5_BAD_DB.
+
+\end{document}